Re: RFA: >, >>, and "tee" operators

Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-31T16:36:34Z

On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:32:19AM -0700, david carlton wrote:
> So I think that, if this syntax is changed, the fact that expressions
> could start with unary minus signs is going to cause much less
> grumbling from users than the fact that, once the old p/x syntax gets
> obsoleted, they'll have to convert over to typing p -x instead.

Which, for the record, I never suggested - I think p/x and log -a are
different enough uses of options that they can still both exist without
any real inconsistency.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer