From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28039 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2002 19:05:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28031 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2002 19:05:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2002 19:05:07 -0000 Received: from dsl254-114-118.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.254.114.118] helo=nevyn.them.org ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZcIt-0006a5-00; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:05:08 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZcIr-0004Vv-00; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:05:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Martin Gadbois Cc: Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cross target core debugging: host=i386, Target=PPC Message-ID: <20020730190505.GB17221@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Martin Gadbois , Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3D45ACCC.9040803@colubris.com> <1020729215359.ZM11339@localhost.localdomain> <20020729164057.P3112@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <20020729234439.GA666@nevyn.them.org> <20020730153200.GA619@nevyn.them.org> <3D46B3AC.7030808@colubris.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D46B3AC.7030808@colubris.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00598.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 11:41:32AM -0400, Martin Gadbois wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > | > | PowerPC was the easiest of the bunch to clean up. Here it is. The > | wrappers in ppc-linux-nat.c are just there for type correctness at the > | moment; I believe that eventually changing them to take char * (or some > | target-independent wrapper struct as I believe Kevin proposed some time > | ago) is the right thing to do. > | > | The astute observer will also notice that this patch will segue into > | multi-arching supply_gregset in the near future. > | > | OK? > | > > I tried to apply against 5.2, but a lot of failed chunks. Should I apply it > on 5.2.1 or latest CVS? > > Thanks for the patch! Current CVS; but just get a checkout now, since I've committed my patch. Thanks for the kick to actually do it :) -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer