From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31178 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2002 15:08:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31169 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2002 15:08:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Jul 2002 15:08:44 -0000 Received: from dsl254-114-118.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.254.114.118] helo=nevyn.them.org ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17VCtL-0000wM-00; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:08:31 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17VCtO-0000c7-00; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:08:34 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 08:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michal Ludvig Cc: GDB Patches Subject: Re: [RFA] gdbserver bits Message-ID: <20020718150834.GA29860@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michal Ludvig , GDB Patches References: <3D36D7E7.5080607@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D36D7E7.5080607@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00388.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 04:59:51PM +0200, Michal Ludvig wrote: > Hi, > fifth patch today ;-) > This one adds CS and SS registers to regmap on x86-64 so that they are > stored and properly restored. > Also it adds a forgotten free() to prevent memory leakage in > regsets_store_inferior_registers(). > > Can I commit it? Go ahead. Doesn't GDB have the same problem with CS and SS? -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer