From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13316 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2002 17:59:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13306 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2002 17:59:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (66.187.233.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jul 2002 17:59:42 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (vpn50-2.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.2]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g6FHxfs02365 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:59:42 -0400 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id E4C681C359; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:59:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:05:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] Fix expect build under cygwin + Tcl/Tk 8.3 Message-ID: <20020715175955.GB27999@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020715002731.55d20136.supermo@bayarea.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020715002731.55d20136.supermo@bayarea.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00330.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 12:27:31AM -0700, Mo DeJong wrote: >Hello. > >I am just checking back on a patch I sent in: > >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-05/msg00621.html > >It got one response: > >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-05/msg00654.html > >> >The current CVS version of expect does not build correctly under >> >Cygwin. The root of the problem is that expect is searching for a >> >tclConfig.sh file in tcl/unix when it should be looking in tcl/win. >> >The following patch fixes the problem by updating the m4 macros used by >> >the expect build. > >> AFAIK, expect shouldn't be using the win version of anything. It is >> supposed to be using a UNIX-only implementation of tcl. >> cgf > >I guess it would have helped if I had included the more detailed >description from my earlier post to the insight list: What would have helped would have been if it actually failed for me. I can build expect with no problem. Again, expect is not supposed to be using the windows version of anything. It is supposed to be using the cygwin/unix version. cgf