From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16734 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2002 18:05:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16722 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2002 18:05:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jul 2002 18:05:17 -0000 Received: from dsl254-114-096.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.254.114.96] helo=nevyn.them.org) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17UA12-0005Ue-00; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:52:08 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17UA10-0006yx-00; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:52:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:18:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/5.2/commit] Zap __func__ Message-ID: <20020715175206.GA19809@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3D32FB89.8030403@ges.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D32FB89.8030403@ges.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00331.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 12:42:49PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Just FYI, > > I've committed this to the 5.2 branch - zap more __func__s. It's brutal > but it works :-) > > enjoy, > Andrew > 2002-07-15 Andrew Cagney > > * dwarf2cfi.c: Replace __func__ with "?func?". Er, hunh? First of all, is there any reason that __FUNCTION__ is not adequately portable? I think it is. Second of all, if you're going to remove __func__ you could at least replace it with the name of the function. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer