Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
Cc: Momchil Velikov <velco@fadata.bg>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RDI code busy-waiting on running target?
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:59:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020715125032.A19565@visi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D32F8DB.30803@ges.redhat.com>; from ac131313@ges.redhat.com on Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 12:31:23PM -0400

On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 12:31:23PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> >> If it is a timeout, it should be waiting for min (time until next 
> >> timeout, gui keep alive delta).
> > 
> > Sorry, I've no idea what that means.  Care to explain?

[...]

> The code appears to be implementing a timer using polling. 

The command-line UI or Insight?  (Are there any other linked-in
UIs?)

> Something somewhere must know the intended timer frequency and
> hence the sleep should be the minimum of:
> 
> 	-	time to next timer event
> 	-	frequency that gui wants control

Doh!  Now I see. I completely missed that the min ([...], [...])
was pseudo-code.  What do other targets do?  (I should go
look.)  10ms is the minimum practical delay under most of the
Linux or Linux-like OSes that I know about.  Longer is easier.
Shorter isn't.

-- 
Grant Edwards
grante@visi.com


  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-15 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20020711175854.A29971@visi.com>
2002-07-11 16:53 ` Grant Edwards
2002-07-11 17:28   ` Keith Seitz
2002-07-11 17:44     ` Grant Edwards
2002-07-12  8:24   ` Grant Edwards
2002-07-12 11:04     ` Grant Edwards
2002-07-14 10:04       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-14 10:10         ` Momchil Velikov
2002-07-14 11:28           ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-15  0:28             ` Grant Edwards
2002-07-15  9:42               ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-15 10:59                 ` Grant Edwards [this message]
2002-07-11 19:08 Dan Kegel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020715125032.A19565@visi.com \
    --to=grante@visi.com \
    --cc=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=velco@fadata.bg \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox