Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
Cc: Johan Rydberg <jrydberg@rtmk.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remote_rcmd
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:48:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020714173945.GB30061@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D31A763.7020904@ges.redhat.com>

On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 12:31:31PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This small patch adds support for receving more that ~200 bytes
> >of output from the "qRcmd" request (ie the monitor command).
> >
> >I have no idea if this will break any stubs, but hopefully not.
> >I don't know how often stubs implement the qRcmd request.
> >
> >2002-06-27  Johan Rydberg  <jrydberg@rtmk.org>
> >
> >        * remote.c (remote_rcmd): Continue reading output from
> >        stub until receiving OK.
> 
> If I understand this patch correctly, it is changing things so that it 
> allows:
> 
> 	-> rCmd <command>
> 	<- <HEX-OUTPUT>
> 	<- <HEX-OUTPUT>
> 	<- OK
> 
> This is wrong.  The target should send:
> 
> 	-> rCmd <command>
> 	<- O <HEX-OUTPUT>
> 	<- O <HEX-OUTPUT>
> 	<- OK
> 
> when transfering a longer buffer.

Actually, the current docs suggest:

-> qRcmd command
<- O <HEX-OUTPUT>
<- O <HEX-OUTPUT>
<- <HEX-OUTPUT>
<- OK

which confuses me.  What's supposed to differentiate the O <HEX-OUTPUT>
packets from the final <HEX-OUTPUT> packet (what difference in purpose,
I mean)?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-14 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20020627035114.M1899@cockmaster.bredbandsbolaget.se>
2002-07-14  9:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-14 10:48   ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-07-14 11:00     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-14 11:01       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-14 17:53         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-15 11:49           ` Johan Rydberg
2002-07-15 13:02             ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020714173945.GB30061@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jrydberg@rtmk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox