From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
Cc: Johan Rydberg <jrydberg@rtmk.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remote_rcmd
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020714173945.GB30061@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D31A763.7020904@ges.redhat.com>
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 12:31:31PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This small patch adds support for receving more that ~200 bytes
> >of output from the "qRcmd" request (ie the monitor command).
> >
> >I have no idea if this will break any stubs, but hopefully not.
> >I don't know how often stubs implement the qRcmd request.
> >
> >2002-06-27 Johan Rydberg <jrydberg@rtmk.org>
> >
> > * remote.c (remote_rcmd): Continue reading output from
> > stub until receiving OK.
>
> If I understand this patch correctly, it is changing things so that it
> allows:
>
> -> rCmd <command>
> <- <HEX-OUTPUT>
> <- <HEX-OUTPUT>
> <- OK
>
> This is wrong. The target should send:
>
> -> rCmd <command>
> <- O <HEX-OUTPUT>
> <- O <HEX-OUTPUT>
> <- OK
>
> when transfering a longer buffer.
Actually, the current docs suggest:
-> qRcmd command
<- O <HEX-OUTPUT>
<- O <HEX-OUTPUT>
<- <HEX-OUTPUT>
<- OK
which confuses me. What's supposed to differentiate the O <HEX-OUTPUT>
packets from the final <HEX-OUTPUT> packet (what difference in purpose,
I mean)?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-14 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020627035114.M1899@cockmaster.bredbandsbolaget.se>
2002-07-14 9:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-14 10:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-07-14 11:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-14 11:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-14 17:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-15 11:49 ` Johan Rydberg
2002-07-15 13:02 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020714173945.GB30061@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jrydberg@rtmk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox