From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Jim Ingham <jingham@apple.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix to processing end of function stab in dbxread.c
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020712173056.GA989@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ACB33854-9512-11D6-AB35-00039379E320@apple.com>
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 02:10:49PM -0700, Jim Ingham wrote:
> >I judge from your example that MacOSX has resolved addresses attached
> >to N_SLINE stabs, but not in ending N_FUN stabs? GDB assumes that
> >function_start_offset applies to both of them equally (and it will be
> >zero if we expect both to be resolved). On GNU/Linux both N_SLINE and
> >final N_FUN have offsets within the function. I suspect that on some
> >Solaris variant N_SLINE and final N_FUN will both have resolved values.
> >In that case using last_function_start + valu will put us well outside
> >of the actual function, causing mayhem.
>
> That's right. MacOS X's linker does fix up the SLINE stabs, but it
> does what stabs.texi says to do with the end of function stabs.
>
> It would suprise me if there were a Solaris compile/linker that does
> otherwise with the end of FUN stab. After all, it seems like the
> Solaris tools go out of their way to avoid having STABS that the linker
> has to fix up. Also, the comment in stabs.texi says "Recent versions
> of GCC will mark the end of the function with an N_FUN symbol..."
> Sounds like the Solaris compilers may not have this end of function FUN
> stab at all.
>
> Would somebody with access to a Solaris box with acc on it compile a
> simple program with "-g" and see if it has this stab, and if so what
> its value is?
>
> I bet the code I suggested will work fine.
ACC is HP/UX, isn't it? The Sun compiler is Sun Workshop CC. In any
case, it appears that Solaris does not mark the end of functions with
stabs. I'm satisfied; sorry for the runaround.
You might want to repost the patch not-mangled this time; since your
mail client persistently wraps things attaching it might be simplest.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-12 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-10 19:08 Jim Ingham
2002-07-11 2:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-11 11:42 ` Jim Ingham
2002-07-11 11:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-11 16:40 ` Jim Ingham
2002-07-12 10:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-07-12 11:03 ` Jim Ingham
2003-02-18 15:41 ` Elena Zannoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020712173056.GA989@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jingham@apple.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox