From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Petr Sorfa <petrs@caldera.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com" <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DW_AT_calling_convention support REV 2
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020710184710.GA923@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D2C80A8.35D678FE@caldera.com>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:44:56PM -0400, Petr Sorfa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Revised patch for supporting DW_AT_calling_convention. This helps GDB
> identify the "main" program for languages that do not have a starting
> subroutine called "main". It adds a new API set for keeping track of the
> symbol associated with "main". Note that there are 3 checks for
> DW_AT_calling_convention. They are all necessary as they are detected at
> different times when processing program debug information.
I wasn't quite clear... there's one thing that should be different.
> + /* Determine whether the symbol passed is equivalent to
> + the ``main'' symbol. Returns 0 if not or if there is no ``main''
> + symbol set. */
> + int
> + is_main_symbol (struct symbol *check_symbol)
> + {
> + return (check_symbol == NULL ? 0 : symbol_of_main == check_symbol);
> + }
>
> void
> _initialize_symtab (void)
I was thinking like:
int
is_main_symbol (struct symbol *check_symbol)
{
if (symbol_of_main && symbol_of_main == check_symbol)
return 1;
else if (strcmp (SYMBOL_NAME (check_symbol), get_main_name ()) == 0)
return 1;
return 0;
}
And then change all callers of get_main_name () to use this.
(Note that this requires being careful if symbol_of_main gets
unloaded and we load a C program afterwards!)
Make sense? Sound reasonable?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-10 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-10 11:41 Petr Sorfa
2002-07-10 11:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-07-10 12:32 ` Petr Sorfa
2002-07-10 12:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-10 14:06 ` Petr Sorfa
2002-07-11 8:07 ` Petr Sorfa
2002-07-11 9:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020710184710.GA923@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=petrs@caldera.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox