From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28993 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2002 16:25:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28983 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2002 16:25:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Jul 2002 16:25:44 -0000 Received: from dsl254-114-096.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.254.114.96] helo=nevyn.them.org) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17Q9QJ-0000QJ-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 11:25:39 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Q9QO-0006tc-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 12:25:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 09:34:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pierre Muller Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Resend: [RFA] Fix problem with i386 watchpoints after restarting Message-ID: <20020704162544.GA26409@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pierre Muller , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200206131016.g5DAGcf00647@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <4.2.0.58.20020613091046.01957c70@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4.2.0.58.20020613091046.01957c70@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4.2.0.58.20020704143015.02832028@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20020704143015.02832028@ics.u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00086.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 03:12:46PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote: > At 15:35 17/06/2002 , Pierre Muller a écrit: > >At 12:16 13/06/2002 , Mark Kettenis a écrit: > > >Sorry, I somehow missed your earlier message. This seems to me as an > > >acceptable way to solve the problem (although I still think there is > > >something wrong with GDB's mechanism of removing hardware breakpoints. > > >But: could you add the reason why this is needed to the comment. > > >Minor nit: Please end your sentences with a '.' and put two spaces > > >after it. > >OK, I slightly modifed the patch > >by adding a comment to i386-nat.c > >and correcting the comment in the nm-i386.h file. > > > >Can I check this in? > > After getting approval by a private mail, I have > checked this in. Is this appropriate for the branch also? My instincts say yes. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer