From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-16578-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 29626 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2002 18:38:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 29611 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2002 18:38:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dragon.nuxi.com) (66.92.13.169)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Jun 2002 18:38:42 -0000
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.4/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5SIcftL049409;
	Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.5/8.12.4/Submit) id g5SIce81049408;
	Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:38:00 -0000
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [5.2.1] quiet warnings for gdbreplay.c
Message-ID: <20020628113840.A44046@dragon.nuxi.com>
Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org
References: <20020627204720.A13445@dragon.nuxi.com> <3D1C8AEF.5020508@ges.redhat.com> <20020628180820.GA9115@nevyn.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20020628180820.GA9115@nevyn.them.org>; from drow@mvista.com on Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 02:08:20PM -0400
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5
X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00572.txt.bz2

On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 02:08:20PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:12:31PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > >+#ifdef HAVE_STRING_H
> > >+#include <string.h>
> > >+#endif
> > 
> > Should that bit be "gdb_string.h"?
> 
> That depends :)  gdbreplay is not part of GDB and has a different
> config.h header (tests for a different set of macros).  I had
> eliminated all references to the gdb source code but...

Let me know which way is best.