From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28320 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2002 08:03:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28191 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2002 08:03:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.macqel.be) (194.78.208.39) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Jun 2002 08:03:47 -0000 Received: (from phdm@localhost) by mail.macqel.be (8.10.2/8.10.2/SuSE Linux 8.10.0-0.3) id g5Q83f028100; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 10:03:41 +0200 Message-Id: <200206260803.g5Q83f028100@mail.macqel.be> Subject: Re: RFA: don't read coff line number unless we have symbols too In-Reply-To: from Jim Blandy at "Jun 25, 2002 05:03:47 pm" To: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 01:03:00 -0000 CC: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com From: "Philippe De Muyter" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00532.txt.bz2 Jim Blandy wrote : > > Joel Brobecker writes: > > Hello, > > > Seems OK to me. > > > > This change seems to be causing some problems. Unfortunately, I don't > > have all the details yet. Can we put this patch on hold until I collect > > all the information, please? > > Sure. > > It's supposed to be semantically undetectable, except for not reading > the line number info. The code simply makes GDB not read info from > the executable that it will never use. If that expectation is > incorrect, I definitely want to know. > > Should the following lines not be kept outside of the conditional block ? info->min_lineno_offset = 0; info->max_lineno_offset = 0;