From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29794 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2002 02:30:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29761 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2002 02:30:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO otisco.McKusick.COM) (209.31.233.190) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Jun 2002 02:30:18 -0000 Received: (from hilfingr@localhost) by otisco.McKusick.COM (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA21747; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 19:30:10 -0700 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 19:30:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200206250230.TAA21747@otisco.McKusick.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: hilfingr set sender to hilfingr@otisco.mckusick.com using -f From: "Paul N. Hilfinger" To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: don't read coff line number unless we have symbols too Reply-to: Hilfinger@otisco.mckusick.com X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00502.txt.bz2 OK. Further investigation (by Donn Terry) indicates that this change is not a problem. In the cases on Interix that we were worried about, there is still a linker symbol table with non-debugging symbols, and so the line numbers aren't tossed after all. Paul Hilfinger