From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa:arm] rewrite arm_push_arguments() as a single two pass loop
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 06:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200206121311.OAA17242@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 May 2002 11:07:19 EDT." <3CF64027.7080702@cygnus.com>
> > Hello,
> >
> > The code to push arguments onto the stack, for many ABI's, involves two passes:
> >
> > 1. iterate over the arguments. compute the location/offset of each, accumulate results (to compute the size of the stack frame).
> >
> > 2. iterate over the arguments, compute the location/offset of each, store accordingly
> >
> > The attached patch rewrites arm_push_arguments() so that the two passes are combined into a single two-pass for-loop. The only difference between the first and second pass of the loop is that the second pass stores values. The intent is to make the maintenance of the function easier - e.g. adding FP support would now involve one addition (currently it involves two).
> >
> > Thoughts, on the general approach?
> >
> > It also adds the command ``set debug arm'' which will cause the code to print out the arguments as they are pushed.
> >
> > Ok for arm?
> > Andrew
>
> Hmm, with patch ...
>
Looks ok to me (at least, I can't spot any problems by inspection).
R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-12 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-29 20:32 Andrew Cagney
2002-05-30 8:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-30 11:15 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-06-12 6:12 ` Richard Earnshaw [this message]
2002-06-12 14:48 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200206121311.OAA17242@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=rearnsha@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox