From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21628 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2002 12:54:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21570 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2002 12:54:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2002 12:54:21 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id NAA25023; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:54:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma024838; Wed, 12 Jun 02 13:54:05 +0100 Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.1.91]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA15514; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:54:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18]) by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA15358; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:54:04 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200206121254.NAA15358@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> To: Andrew Cagney cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. X-Url: http://www.arm.com/ Subject: Re: [rfa:sim/arm,arm] Add include/gdb/sim-arm.h In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 May 2002 22:08:44 EDT." <3CF589AC.7020900@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 05:54:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00186.txt.bz2 > Hello, > > The attached patch better pins down the ARM <-> SIM interface by > introducing an enum to specify the register numbers to be used across > the interface. > > Ok? > > I guess I need to get the sim/arm and arm-tdep maintainers to both agree > agree with each other and agree to the change :-) It looks ok to me, if Nick is also happy with it. Of course, I'll have to change it all when I add the privileged mode registers ;-) R.