From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23547 invoked by alias); 29 May 2002 17:08:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23504 invoked from network); 29 May 2002 17:08:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 May 2002 17:08:24 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4TH81M02144; Wed, 29 May 2002 12:08:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 12:01:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200205291708.g4TH81M02144@duracef.shout.net> To: cagney@mac.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: try_catch.cc -> try-catch.cc X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg01008.txt.bz2 I actually thought about that. :) I believe this section applies: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/onlinedocs/gdbint_16.html#SEC157 The source language programs do @emph{not} need to be in a consistent style. Since @value{GDBN} is used to debug programs written in many different styles, it's worth having a mix of styles in the testsuite; for instance, some @value{GDBN} bugs involving the display of source lines would never manifest themselves if the programs used GNU coding style uniformly. I know it's unlikely that gdb will ever have a bug where it can't handle '_' in a filename. (Although gdb does have filename completion). It's more the principle of keeping the test suite programs diverse and uncanonicalized. I'll change it if you want it changed, though. Michael C