From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-15954-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 23962 invoked by alias); 29 May 2002 15:19:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 23928 invoked from network); 29 May 2002 15:19:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.constant.com) (198.92.136.102)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 May 2002 15:19:37 -0000
Received: from constant.com (mail [198.92.136.102])
	by mail.constant.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g4TFIRxX027209;
	Wed, 29 May 2002 10:18:28 -0500
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 08:34:00 -0000
From: "B. Kosnik" <bkoz@nabi.net>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: mec@shout.net, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdb.c++ testsuite 1.3: member_data_static.exp (resend)
Message-Id: <20020529081930.325bc903.bkoz@nabi.net>
In-Reply-To: <20020529150837.GA21893@branoic.them.org>
References: <200205282112.g4SLCap24212@duracef.shout.net>
	<20020529030004.4d9ce9e5.bkoz@redhat.com>
	<20020529150837.GA21893@branoic.them.org>
Reply-To: bkoz@redhat.com
Organization: secret_agent_headquarters
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg01002.txt.bz2


> Compile the testcase (just -c will do).  Then run `nm' over the
> symbols.  Look for the `data' member; it isn't there.  <optimized out>
> is correct. My C++ lawyering is a little rusty, but I believe this is
> correct; it's a templated member, and not explicitly instantiated, and
> not even implicitly instantiated.  I don't see a reason for it to be
> emitted, and if it isn't emitted GDB can't help you figure out what
> its value is.

Aaah. You are correct. 

Adding:
template class __gnu_test::gnu_obj_3<long>;
template class __gnu_test::gnu_obj_2<int>;

Gives:

(gdb) p test3
$1 = {static data = {<gnu_obj_1> = {static test = true, static key1 = 5,

      static key2 = 77, static value = oriental}, _vptr.gnu_obj_2 =
0x8092fac, 
    static value_derived = etruscan}}

So, with this addition, this test case would pass, no?

-benjamin