From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16376 invoked by alias); 29 May 2002 03:14:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16369 invoked from network); 29 May 2002 03:14:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 May 2002 03:14:51 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4T3EgN26304; Tue, 28 May 2002 22:14:42 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 03:00:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200205290314.g4T3EgN26304@duracef.shout.net> To: ac131313@cygnus.com, bkoz@redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb.c++ testsuite 2.1: try_catch.exp Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00999.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > Try it using HP'x C++ compiler. The re-vamped mechanism came in as part > of the HP merge so should have at least worked there. I'm not sure if there is a spot of confusion here. The new try_catch.exp test PASSes all its tests with all the compilers I tested (g++ v2 and g++ v3). In the long run, I'd like to get access to an hpux machine for my testing project, but that's not even on my TODO list yet. Michael C