From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18272 invoked by alias); 28 May 2002 16:17:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18256 invoked from network); 28 May 2002 16:17:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dr-evil.shagadelic.org) (208.176.2.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 May 2002 16:17:49 -0000 Received: by dr-evil.shagadelic.org (Postfix, from userid 7518) id AB1B19869; Tue, 28 May 2002 09:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 09:23:00 -0000 From: Jason R Thorpe To: Michal Ludvig Cc: Mark Kettenis , GDB Patches Subject: Re: [RFA] Moving x86-64 configuration to separate directory Message-ID: <20020528091745.J22765@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jason R Thorpe , Michal Ludvig , Mark Kettenis , GDB Patches References: <200205272200.g4RM0T400654@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3CF374D0.1030709@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3CF374D0.1030709@suse.cz>; from mludvig@suse.cz on Tue, May 28, 2002 at 02:15:12PM +0200 Organization: Wasabi Systems, Inc. X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00973.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 02:15:12PM +0200, Michal Ludvig wrote: > I was told it isn't possible to have gdb supporting both x86-64 and i386 > unless i386 is fully mutliarched. And after it is I don't need to treat > them as different flavors of one arch, do I? But further decoupling the x86-64 code from the i386 code isn't going to make it easier to remedy the situation in the future. -- -- Jason R. Thorpe