From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23483 invoked by alias); 27 May 2002 23:02:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23476 invoked from network); 27 May 2002 23:02:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dr-evil.shagadelic.org) (208.176.2.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 May 2002 23:02:25 -0000 Received: by dr-evil.shagadelic.org (Postfix, from userid 7518) id 5A6BC986B; Mon, 27 May 2002 16:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 01:11:00 -0000 From: Jason R Thorpe To: Mark Kettenis Cc: Michal Ludvig , GDB Patches Subject: Re: [RFA] Moving x86-64 configuration to separate directory Message-ID: <20020527160225.C22765@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jason R Thorpe , Mark Kettenis , Michal Ludvig , GDB Patches References: <200205272200.g4RM0T400654@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200205272200.g4RM0T400654@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>; from kettenis@chello.nl on Mon, May 27, 2002 at 06:59:15PM +0200 Organization: Wasabi Systems, Inc. X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00957.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 06:59:15PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > If you want these targets to become really seperate, we should > consider doing a repository copy of the files to preserve their > history. Personally, I think splitting x86-64 out of i386 is the wrong approach. I fully intend to support debugging both 32-bit and 64-bit code from within the forthcoming x86_64-netbsd GDB configuration. -- -- Jason R. Thorpe