From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-15804-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 5218 invoked by alias); 22 May 2002 09:14:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 5200 invoked from network); 22 May 2002 09:14:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 May 2002 09:14:16 -0000
Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id KAA12288; Wed, 22 May 2002 10:14:14 +0100 (BST)
Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xma011770; Wed, 22 May 02 10:13:47 +0100
Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.1.91])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA05787;
	Wed, 22 May 2002 10:13:46 +0100 (BST)
Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18])
	by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA18003;
	Wed, 22 May 2002 10:13:45 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200205220913.KAA18003@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, rearnsha@arm.com
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
X-Url: http://www.arm.com/
Subject: Re: [RFA] Arm/Thumb tweak for generic_dummy_frames 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 21 May 2002 18:26:54 PDT."
             <200205220126.g4M1Qsg03294@reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 02:52:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00852.txt.bz2


msnyder@cygnus.com said:
>  This is a corner case that Andrew missed when he did the transition
> to generic dummy frames.

> 2002-05-21  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@redhat.com>

> 	* arm-tdep.c (arm_frame_chain): Recognize dummy-frame as a
> 	special case that does not indicate a transition from arm
> 	to thumb or vice versa. 

I can't (easily) work out from this what was wrong, and how you've fixed 
it.  Could you provide some more detailed analysis?  Why would a dummy 
frame never involve a transition between ARM and Thumb state?

R.