From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-15753-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 30628 invoked by alias); 19 May 2002 14:50:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 30621 invoked from network); 19 May 2002 14:50:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 May 2002 14:50:48 -0000
Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id PAA08035; Sun, 19 May 2002 15:50:47 +0100 (BST)
Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xma008027; Sun, 19 May 02 15:50:46 +0100
Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.1.91])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA21966;
	Sun, 19 May 2002 15:50:45 +0100 (BST)
Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18])
	by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA25396;
	Sun, 19 May 2002 15:50:45 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200205191450.PAA25396@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
X-Url: http://www.arm.com/
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] builtin-regs buglet 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 18 May 2002 17:24:41 EDT."
             <3CE6C699.7040706@cygnus.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 07:50:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00801.txt.bz2

> > 
> > You said it...
> > 
> > The size of this, plus some of the attendant changes elsewhere, makes me 
> > wonder whether we should create a separate branch -- this could be quite 
> > destabilizing, particularly for some of the target connections that use 
> > the revised ARM code.
> 
> Yes.  Could use the regbuf branch or create your own.  I can test 
> against arm-sim and I could do with an extra target to test against.
> 
> As for the change, I suspect there are two steps: make everything a 
> pseudo (probably the bit to have on the branch?); then add lots more to 
> the raw/pseudo registers.

Putting it in the regbuf branch might be best, but it'll need the 
REGISTER_SIM_REGNO patch if I'm to get the sim target working.

R.