From: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Generic OS ABI handling
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 11:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020517115335.D14437@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200205171235.NAA22247@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>; from rearnsha@arm.com on Fri, May 17, 2002 at 01:35:30PM +0100
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 01:35:30PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> Sorry Jason, I don't think this is correct. I don't think that it will
> correctly handle the fact that existing GNU binutils tools for ARM set the
> ELFOSABI field to ELFOSABI_ARM for starters, or the fact that ARM's
D'oh, yes, you're right.
> Maybe a sniffer registration should be able to set a priority level (maybe
> just SPECIFIC/GENERIC) in a return field, then a SPECIFIC selection will
> always override a GENERIC selection. A generic sniffer would always be
> registered as returning a GENERIC match, and specific system sniffers
> could override that.
Hm. Since there's already bfd_arch_unknown for wildcarded sniffers,
a sniffer with bfd_arch_<...> could be considered "specific". I coded
this up, updated the docs, and will post another patch with the change
in a separate message.
> Is not strictly correct (it's a derivative of a comment that I wrote
> before I fully understood the meaning of this field).
Okay, fixed.
Thanks!
--
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-17 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-13 12:08 Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-16 10:02 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-16 14:57 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-16 15:17 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-16 15:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-16 15:42 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-16 15:56 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-16 16:11 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-16 19:53 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-16 20:42 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-17 0:04 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-17 1:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-05-17 3:14 ` Alfred M. Szmidt
2002-05-17 10:51 ` Michael Snyder
2002-05-17 11:11 ` Alfred M. Szmidt
2002-05-17 11:33 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-17 11:46 ` Alfred M. Szmidt
2002-05-17 11:57 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-17 12:00 ` Alfred M. Szmidt
2002-05-17 11:31 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-05-17 5:35 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-17 11:53 ` Jason R Thorpe [this message]
2002-05-17 9:59 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020517115335.D14437@dr-evil.shagadelic.org \
--to=thorpej@wasabisystems.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox