From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2912 invoked by alias); 17 May 2002 17:47:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2844 invoked from network); 17 May 2002 17:47:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dr-evil.shagadelic.org) (208.176.2.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 May 2002 17:47:13 -0000 Received: by dr-evil.shagadelic.org (Postfix, from userid 7518) id 9B38F9869; Fri, 17 May 2002 10:47:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:47:00 -0000 From: Jason R Thorpe To: m.m.kettenis@chello.nl Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, msnyder@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com, ac131313@cygnus.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Don't gdbarch_init for core files Message-ID: <20020517104712.A14437@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jason R Thorpe , m.m.kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, msnyder@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com, ac131313@cygnus.com References: <20020517135849.ZGDH1268.amsfep15-int.chello.nl@[127.0.0.1]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020517135849.ZGDH1268.amsfep15-int.chello.nl@[127.0.0.1]>; from m.m.kettenis@chello.nl on Fri, May 17, 2002 at 03:58:49PM +0200 Organization: Wasabi Systems, Inc. X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00729.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 03:58:49PM +0200, m.m.kettenis@chello.nl wrote: > if (!exec_bfd) > set_gdbarch_from_file (core_bfd); > > I tested this, and it seems to solve the problems for me when testing > my pending i386 multi-arch patches on Linux. Hm, why didn't I think of that :-) This would be totally cool with me. -- -- Jason R. Thorpe