From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9614 invoked by alias); 15 May 2002 17:41:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9568 invoked from network); 15 May 2002 17:41:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 May 2002 17:41:04 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id SAA27579; Wed, 15 May 2002 18:41:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma027552; Wed, 15 May 02 18:40:57 +0100 Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.1.91]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA04624; Wed, 15 May 2002 18:40:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18]) by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA16546; Wed, 15 May 2002 18:40:56 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200205151740.SAA16546@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> To: Andrew Cagney cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. X-Url: http://www.arm.com/ Subject: Re: [patch] arm-netbsd clean up native include file. In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 May 2002 13:31:09 EDT." <3CE29B5D.4070801@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 10:41:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00613.txt.bz2 > > > > Nor should there be with , since config/arm isn't on the > > include path. This is the convention in all the other include files I've > > seen that play this sort of game. > > True. GDB tends to play this game: > > config/i386/nm-nbsd.h:#include "config/nm-nbsd.h" > config/i386/tm-nbsd.h:#include "config/tm-nbsd.h" > config/sparc/nm-nbsd.h:#include "config/nm-nbsd.h" > > So the question of <> behavour is avoided. > True. I'll change it. BTW for i in `find . -name \*.h -print` do base=`basename $i` fgrep \"$base\" $i /dev/null |grep include done ./alpha/nm-linux.h:#include "nm-linux.h" ./arm/nm-linux.h:#include "nm-linux.h" ./arm/tm-linux.h:#include "tm-linux.h" ./arm/xm-nbsd.h:#include "xm-nbsd.h" ./i386/nm-gnu.h:#include "nm-gnu.h" ./i386/nm-m3.h:#include "nm-m3.h" ./i386/nm-linux.h:#include "nm-linux.h" ./i386/tm-linux.h:#include "tm-linux.h" ./i386/tm-vxworks.h:#include "tm-vxworks.h" ./i386/xm-nbsd.h:#include "xm-nbsd.h" ./ia64/nm-linux.h:#include "nm-linux.h" ./ia64/tm-linux.h:#include "tm-linux.h" ./m68k/nm-linux.h:#include "nm-linux.h" ./m68k/nm-nbsd.h:#include "nm-nbsd.h" ./m68k/nm-sysv4.h:#include "nm-sysv4.h" ./m68k/tm-linux.h:#include "tm-linux.h" ./m68k/tm-nbsd.h:#include "tm-nbsd.h" ./m68k/xm-nbsd.h:#include "xm-nbsd.h" ./mips/nm-linux.h:#include "nm-linux.h" ./mips/tm-linux.h:#include "tm-linux.h" ./ns32k/nm-nbsd.h:#include "nm-nbsd.h" ./ns32k/tm-nbsd.h:#include "tm-nbsd.h" ./ns32k/xm-nbsd.h:#include "xm-nbsd.h" ./powerpc/nm-linux.h:#include "nm-linux.h" ./powerpc/nm-nbsd.h:#include "nm-nbsd.h" ./powerpc/tm-linux.h:#include "tm-linux.h" ./powerpc/tm-nbsd.h:#include "tm-nbsd.h" ./powerpc/tm-vxworks.h:#include "tm-vxworks.h" ./rs6000/xm-aix4.h:#include "xm-aix4.h" ./sh/tm-linux.h:#include "tm-linux.h" ./sparc/nm-linux.h:#include "nm-linux.h" ./sparc/tm-linux.h:#include "tm-linux.h" ./sparc/tm-nbsd.h:#include "tm-nbsd.h" ./sparc/xm-nbsd.h:#include "xm-nbsd.h"