From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-15546-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 32103 invoked by alias); 15 May 2002 12:39:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 32084 invoked from network); 15 May 2002 12:39:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 May 2002 12:39:28 -0000
Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id NAA05429; Wed, 15 May 2002 13:39:27 +0100 (BST)
Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xma005123; Wed, 15 May 02 13:39:11 +0100
Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.1.91])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA03589;
	Wed, 15 May 2002 13:39:10 +0100 (BST)
Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18])
	by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA14345;
	Wed, 15 May 2002 13:39:10 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200205151239.NAA14345@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Andrew Volkov <Andrew.Volkov@transas.com>,
        gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
X-Url: http://www.arm.com/
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] h8300 Change literal reg numbers to REGNUM macros 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 May 2002 14:33:43 +0200."
             <je661p1tg8.fsf@sykes.suse.de> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 05:39:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00594.txt.bz2

> Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> writes:
>=20
> |> !   return time (0);	//WinXX HAS UNIX like 'time', so why not using it?
> |>=20
> |> C++ style comments are not legal ANSI C.
>=20
> Hmm, which ANSI C do you mean?  C++ style comments are surely valid in
> ANSI C as we know it today.
>=20
> Andreas.
>=20

c89, the original (which, to the best of my knowledge is the standard GDB=20
is coded to).  C++ style comments didn't become legal in C until c99.

R.