From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21546 invoked by alias); 15 May 2002 08:44:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21508 invoked from network); 15 May 2002 08:44:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO potter.sfbay.redhat.com) (205.180.83.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 May 2002 08:44:19 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (remus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.252]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g4F8gkv28461; Wed, 15 May 2002 01:42:47 -0700 Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 01:44:00 -0000 From: Benjamin Kosnik To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: jimb@redhat.com, bkoz@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jingham@apple.com Subject: Re: gdb.c++ testsuite 1: member data Message-Id: <20020515014409.10ee8a59.bkoz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <200205150014.g4F0Em520756@duracef.shout.net> References: <200205150014.g4F0Em520756@duracef.shout.net> Reply-To: bkoz@redhat.com Organization: Red Hat / Paris Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00586.txt.bz2 > > Or will you add the kfails and commit the tests yourself? > > That's quite likely, as I don't expect Benjamin K to be familiar > with the process of filing bug reports. Thanks for taking over on the final bits Michael, I appreciate it. I was mostly concerned with the expect tests themselves, as I'm pretty weak WRT expect/dejagnu. If the testcases are ok in regards to this, then I'll proceed to add further testcases in the same style. I'll probably add a series of try/catch tests, and then go through and add test for derivation and more visibility-type tests for derived templates. Thanks for your help. -benjamin