From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3756 invoked by alias); 14 May 2002 20:17:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3717 invoked from network); 14 May 2002 20:17:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monkey.daikokuya.demon.co.uk) (158.152.184.26) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 May 2002 20:17:46 -0000 Received: from neil by monkey.daikokuya.demon.co.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 177ike-0000ZL-00; Tue, 14 May 2002 21:18:28 +0100 Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 13:17:00 -0000 From: Neil Booth To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: document macro support Message-ID: <20020514201828.GA1851@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> References: <20020513233504.BE1495EA11@zwingli.cygnus.com> <20020514065015.GA22717@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00556.txt.bz2 Jim Blandy wrote:- > > Is there any progress on using libcpp, or is that on the back burner? > > Well, first libcpp needs to be disentangled from GCC. Right now it > shares its configury and build files with GCC, and lives in the `gcc' > directory. All of this makes it rather difficult to share libcpp > between the gcc and sourceware repositories. Zack W. has volunteered > to disintegrate libcpp, but apparently the 3.2 release process hinders > this. > > I'll be posting GDB tests for the macro support in the next few days. > They will include tests for the bugs you pointed out in my macro > expander, so the issues with token marking won't be forgotten. OK, great. IIRC Zack indicated he might be able to move CPP before 3.2, but let's see. I have no idea if he has time. Neil.