From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13188 invoked by alias); 14 May 2002 19:29:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13152 invoked from network); 14 May 2002 19:29:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 May 2002 19:29:14 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4EJTAt18017; Tue, 14 May 2002 14:29:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:29:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200205141929.g4EJTAt18017@duracef.shout.net> To: bkoz@redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb.c++ testsuite 1: member data Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com, jingham@apple.com X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00553.txt.bz2 Sounds good to me. I welcome new tests. New tests with FAILs in them need to have comments with the form: setup_kfail "gdb/NNN" where NNN is a gnats PR number. The goal is for all FAILs to be connected to PR's. I have put this on my to-do list, which is a bit long right now. :-/ ETA tomorrow night maybe. Michael C