From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31672 invoked by alias); 13 May 2002 23:09:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31649 invoked from network); 13 May 2002 23:09:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 May 2002 23:09:00 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 177Ow1-0005FO-00; Mon, 13 May 2002 19:08:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 16:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Type cleanups Message-ID: <20020513230853.GA20143@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020513003359.GA11672@nevyn.them.org> <3CDF3081.1020900@cygnus.com> <20020513135950.GB19484@nevyn.them.org> <3CDFDDB9.7020904@cygnus.com> <20020513185031.GB16618@nevyn.them.org> <20020513185935.GA32424@nevyn.them.org> <3CE03AE6.5040306@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CE03AE6.5040306@cygnus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00508.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 06:15:02PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >I don't get that on the three systems I use. Bug in the system library? > > > >> > >>Hmm, I'm not sure where the necessary preprocessor definitions are > >>coming from to make that definition visible. I'll look in to it. > > > > > >Answer: apparently it is standards-conforming to define JB_* in > >. This means that all of the tm-*.h files which define JB_ > >variables are somewhat dubious. We should probably rename our copies > >of these constants. And kill the ones we don't use, which amounts to > >almost all of them. > > So something like: > > /^#[[:space:]]*define[[:space:]]*JB_/ > > should be ARIed as well? > > If yes, I'll do that and add a corresponding bug report. That sounds like a good idea to me. These constants obviously appear in host headers, so we shouldn't be defining them for target headers. The references will change name naturally when the definitions do. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer