From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21149 invoked by alias); 13 May 2002 18:59:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21136 invoked from network); 13 May 2002 18:59:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 May 2002 18:59:38 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 177L2l-0008ST-00; Mon, 13 May 2002 14:59:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 11:59:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Type cleanups Message-ID: <20020513185935.GA32424@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020513003359.GA11672@nevyn.them.org> <3CDF3081.1020900@cygnus.com> <20020513135950.GB19484@nevyn.them.org> <3CDFDDB9.7020904@cygnus.com> <20020513185031.GB16618@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020513185031.GB16618@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00483.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 02:50:31PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 11:37:29AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > > >>Did you check all the cross targets build per MAINTAINERS? From memory > > >>sh-hms[bfd] and avr[need to look] don't build at present (well as of > > >>~2002-05-12-gmt). > > >> > > >>If that has been checked, then yes ``obviously''. > > > > > > > > >A few don't build; none of them are my fault. For the record: > > > > > > At least fr30-elf, mn10300-elf, and v850-elf have missing > > >dependencies off in sim/ land; they built with non-parallel make only. > > > > > hppa1.1-hp-proelf wants dl.h and machine/save_state.h in > > >hppa-tdep.c, and was already marked broken. The nice gawk segment > > >doesn't notice that... > > > > HP/UX isn't on the list. I get: > > > > hppa1.1-hp-proelf broken > > > > The note should probably mention that you normally want to stip out > > broken targets. > > > > > Several targets (i586-pc-msdosdjgpp, sparc-elf, sparc64-elf) > > > failed with this message (also JB_SP for Sparc): > > > > > >In file included from /usr/include/setjmp.h:30, > > > from ../../src-build/gdb/top.c:58: > > >/usr/include/bits/setjmp.h:31: warning: `JB_PC' redefined > > >tm.h:57: warning: this is the location of the previous definition > > >make[1]: *** [top.o] Error 1 > > > > I don't get that on the three systems I use. Bug in the system library? > > Hmm, I'm not sure where the necessary preprocessor definitions are > coming from to make that definition visible. I'll look in to it. Answer: apparently it is standards-conforming to define JB_* in . This means that all of the tm-*.h files which define JB_ variables are somewhat dubious. We should probably rename our copies of these constants. And kill the ones we don't use, which amounts to almost all of them. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer