From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-15421-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 8155 invoked by alias); 13 May 2002 16:27:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8148 invoked from network); 13 May 2002 16:27:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 May 2002 16:27:21 -0000
Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id RAA13463; Mon, 13 May 2002 17:27:19 +0100 (BST)
Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xma013216; Mon, 13 May 02 17:27:06 +0100
Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.1.91])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA24924;
	Mon, 13 May 2002 17:27:05 +0100 (BST)
Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18])
	by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA25947;
	Mon, 13 May 2002 17:27:04 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200205131627.RAA25947@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
X-Url: http://www.arm.com/
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] builtin-regs buglet 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 13 May 2002 12:22:35 EDT."
             <3CDFE84B.3040306@cygnus.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 09:27:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00469.txt.bz2

> > 	* builtin-regs.c (value_of_builtin_reg): Correctly calculate the
> > 	builtin reg number.
> 
> Oops!  Yes.

Installed.

> 
> Want to live dangerously?  Try setting fp_regnum to -1.  It should 
> [finally] fix the $fp (regname) vs $fp (info registers) problem.

Hmm, one step at a time... My current patch to for the arm is already 
looking somewhat jumbo like.  Unfortunately, I don't really see how I can 
break it down, since the changes are all fairly fundamental.

R.