From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21680 invoked by alias); 13 May 2002 21:28:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21656 invoked from network); 13 May 2002 21:28:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dr-evil.shagadelic.org) (208.176.2.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 May 2002 21:28:00 -0000 Received: by dr-evil.shagadelic.org (Postfix, from userid 7518) id ECA059869; Mon, 13 May 2002 14:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 14:28:00 -0000 From: Jason R Thorpe To: Elena Zannoni Cc: Nick Clifton , binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Include sh64 support for shle-*-netbsdelf* Message-ID: <20020513142759.C3435@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> Reply-To: thorpej@wasabisystems.com Mail-Followup-To: Jason R Thorpe , Elena Zannoni , Nick Clifton , binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020511115603.W3435@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <20020513082324.R3435@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <15584.11203.728429.774659@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <15584.11203.728429.774659@localhost.redhat.com>; from ezannoni@redhat.com on Mon, May 13, 2002 at 05:10:27PM -0400 Organization: Wasabi Systems, Inc. X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00499.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 05:10:27PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote: > Wouldn't the same change be required to build sh*le-*-netbdself* ? > The tdep gdb file is going to be built for all the sh targets. And that file > requires the sh64 disassembly functions. Yah, probably. I've only been confiugring as sh-netbsdelf and shle-netbsdelf (since that is what the NetBSD OS build framework generally uses). > Even the sh coff targets will require the sh64 stuff. :-( Sigh. Maybe the sh64 stuff should be split out a bit more? -- -- Jason R. Thorpe