From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix gdb/277 by separating types
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 20:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020513031659.GA26356@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200205130310.g4D3A4R20206@duracef.shout.net>
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:10:04PM -0500, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> I do build an object directory from scratch (just to avoid these
> kinds of problems).
>
> BTW I am using gcc 2.95.3, I don't know where you got 2.95.2 from.
>
> I bet the difference in our machines is somewhere in libc.
> I am using stock red hat linux 7.2 glibc, glibc 2.2.4-13.
Are you really? That's interesting. Debian does not include debug
information in the system glibc, I'm quite surprised that Red Hat does.
> It's reproducing on my machine. Here's a shorter recipe:
>
> ./gdb gdb.base/break
> (gdb) break main
> (gdb) run
> (gdb) maint print symbols symbols_output
>
> Have a look at the end of symbols_output in the tarball.
> Mine is reproducibly crapping out in file 'init.c' here:
>
> typedef void (*__gconv_end_fct)();
> typedef int (*__gconv_fct)();
> struct __gconv_info {
> size_t __nsteps;
> struct __gconv_step *__steps;
> struct __gconv_step_data __data[0];
> };
>
> typedef int (*__gconv_init_fct)();
> struct __gconv_step {
>
> When I do maint-print-symbols with gdb 5.2, it runs fine,
> and gives me this output for __gconv_step:
>
> typedef int (*__gconv_init_fct)(struct __gconv_step *);
> struct __gconv_step {
> struct __gconv_loaded_object *__shlib_handle;
> const char *__modname;
> int __counter;
> char *__from_name;
> char *__to_name;
> int (*__fct)(struct __gconv_step *, struct __gconv_step_data *, const unsigned char **, const unsigned char *, unsigned char **, size_t *, int, int);
> int (*__init_fct)(struct __gconv_step *);
> void (*__end_fct)(struct __gconv_step *);
> int __min_needed_from;
> int __max_needed_from;
> int __min_needed_to;
> int __max_needed_to;
> int __stateful;
> void *__data;
> };
The const in __fct is probably what's killing it...
> In the stack trace, I'm seeing it crap out on c_print_type of
> __shlib_handle. __gconv_loaded_object is a forward reference,
> but it is not defined in this symtab: it is defined in a different
> symtab.
Sure enough, I can reproduce the failures if I use a libc with debug
symbols. I'll investigate; patch tabled for the moment.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-13 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-12 20:10 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-05-12 20:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-12 20:13 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-05-12 19:19 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-05-12 19:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-12 17:53 Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-12 22:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-05-13 6:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-13 6:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020513031659.GA26356@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mec@shout.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox