From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2450 invoked by alias); 13 May 2002 02:38:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2443 invoked from network); 13 May 2002 02:38:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 May 2002 02:38:17 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1775j7-0006cM-00; Sun, 12 May 2002 22:38:17 -0400 Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 19:38:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix gdb/277 by separating types Message-ID: <20020513023817.GA20252@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200205130219.g4D2Jch16628@duracef.shout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200205130219.g4D2Jch16628@duracef.shout.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00436.txt.bz2 On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:19:38PM -0500, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > Mr. Test-Bed choked on this pair of patches. He died early in the > first configuration tested, in gdb.base/maint.exp. > > There's a tarball at > > ftp://ftp.shout.net/pub/users/mec/gdb/20020510-drow-test.tar.gz > > That includes gdb.log, the gdb executable, and the core file in it. This is quite odd. The same thing does not happen here, in the roughly same configuration (gcc 2.95.3+patches instead of 2.95.2). There's a failure in maint print type, which I expected but forgot to mention (I changed the debugging output; I'll submit a testsuite fix separately). I can't even reproduce it with your binary, in my test harness, running maint.exp! Does your testbed build in a clean object directory? If not, it's possible that I missed yet another dependency on gdbtypes.h, but that seems unlikely from your binary's debug info. I need a helping hand here. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer