From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23362 invoked by alias); 11 May 2002 17:36:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23355 invoked from network); 11 May 2002 17:36:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dragon.nuxi.com) (66.92.13.169) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 May 2002 17:36:21 -0000 Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.3/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4BHaEev011551; Sat, 11 May 2002 10:36:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g4BHaEC6011550; Sat, 11 May 2002 10:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 10:36:00 -0000 From: "David O'Brien" To: Jason R Thorpe , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, kettenis@gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move Alpha BSD register supply/fill to alphabsd-tdep.c Message-ID: <20020511103614.A11522@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org References: <20020510100446.E3435@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020510100446.E3435@dr-evil.shagadelic.org>; from thorpej@wasabisystems.com on Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:04:47AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00392.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:04:47AM -0700, Jason R Thorpe wrote: > This adds an alphabsd-tdep.c which provides the register supply/fill > stuff for all Alpha BSD targets. This will facilitate cross-debugging > of core files. > > David/Mark -- I'd like to get a nod from one of you before I commit it, > since it does affect FreeBSD/alpha support. I did build an alpha-freebsd > GDB, and it compiles fine. After that, the code path is pretty much the > same for alpha-netbsd, which I obviously tested :-) I see nothing in the diff that causes me any concern for FreeBSD/alpha. Thanks for taking the time to make FreeBSD/alpha part of your patch.