From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7015 invoked by alias); 11 May 2002 01:47:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6804 invoked from network); 11 May 2002 01:47:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 May 2002 01:47:47 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4B1lkr22319; Fri, 10 May 2002 20:47:46 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 18:47:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200205110147.g4B1lkr22319@duracef.shout.net> To: jimb@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: don't xfail ptype test Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00380.txt.bz2 Jim Blandy asks: > So you're going to uncomment the calls to setup_kfail once there's a > released DejaGnu that supports them? That's more or less my intention; it's really up to Fernando. The user base for running gdb tests is small, but it has several dejagnu's to choose from. There's an FSF dejagnu and a sourceware dejagnu, and Cygwin has a very old dejagnu. Michael C