From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-15304-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 32191 invoked by alias); 10 May 2002 18:25:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 32184 invoked from network); 10 May 2002 18:25:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 May 2002 18:25:36 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4AIPaq12948;
	Fri, 10 May 2002 13:25:36 -0500
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 11:25:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200205101825.g4AIPaq12948@duracef.shout.net>
To: petrs@caldera.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Generalizing compiler invocation for FORTRAN95 testsuite
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00352.txt.bz2

> Should I keep my current compiler support in the F95 testsuite or change
> it temporarily until your work becomes available?

Go ahead and keep your current stuff.  If I get my changes into the tree
first, then you can change your compiler selection code.  If your changes
go in first, then I will change them when I check in my code.

Michael C