From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21804 invoked by alias); 10 May 2002 04:28:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21797 invoked from network); 10 May 2002 04:28:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dr-evil.shagadelic.org) (208.176.2.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 May 2002 04:28:25 -0000 Received: by dr-evil.shagadelic.org (Postfix, from userid 7518) id 98DBA9869; Thu, 9 May 2002 21:28:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 21:28:00 -0000 From: Jason R Thorpe To: Jim Blandy Cc: Andrew Cagney , Daniel Jacobowitz , Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Remote UDP support Message-ID: <20020509212823.X3435@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> Reply-To: thorpej@wasabisystems.com Mail-Followup-To: Jason R Thorpe , Jim Blandy , Andrew Cagney , Daniel Jacobowitz , Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3CD9C53D.5060704@cygnus.com> <20020509005348.GA14040@nevyn.them.org> <3CD9E563.3000704@cygnus.com> <20020509030123.GA7864@nevyn.them.org> <3CDABEB1.5008A502@redhat.com> <20020509184410.GA28420@nevyn.them.org> <3CDAE78A.7080508@cygnus.com> <20020509212046.GA3964@nevyn.them.org> <3CDAF7B7.3020904@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jimb@redhat.com on Thu, May 09, 2002 at 10:51:39PM -0500 Organization: Wasabi Systems, Inc. X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2 On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 10:51:39PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > Whenever I've said, "UDP isn't reliable!", nobody has ever reacted > with shock --- "You're kidding! It isn't?" They always say, "Yes, I > know, and I don't care." Indeed. NetBSD supports a remote UDP protocol for kernel debugging, and everyone who uses it pretty much doesn't care that UDP is not a reliable protocol. -- -- Jason R. Thorpe