From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3879 invoked by alias); 9 May 2002 21:20:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3861 invoked from network); 9 May 2002 21:20:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 May 2002 21:20:51 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 175vLC-00014Q-00; Thu, 09 May 2002 17:20:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 14:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Remote UDP support Message-ID: <20020509212046.GA3964@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020508232636.GA10279@nevyn.them.org> <3CD9C53D.5060704@cygnus.com> <20020509005348.GA14040@nevyn.them.org> <3CD9E563.3000704@cygnus.com> <20020509030123.GA7864@nevyn.them.org> <3CDABEB1.5008A502@redhat.com> <20020509184410.GA28420@nevyn.them.org> <3CDAE78A.7080508@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CDAE78A.7080508@cygnus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00295.txt.bz2 On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 05:18:02PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >Andrew, would you be satisfied with a warning in the manual and a > >warning in 'help target remote'? > > No. I think it need to be in the users face. I don't think GDB should > silently let the user to use a broken mechanism. I really don't agree, but your call. Could I at least persuade you down to a one-line warning and no confirmation query? Requiring a separate confirmation just seems like a bad interface decision. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer