From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21781 invoked by alias); 9 May 2002 09:20:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21745 invoked from network); 9 May 2002 09:20:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 May 2002 09:20:30 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id KAA08416; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:20:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma007582; Thu, 9 May 02 10:19:50 +0100 Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.1.91]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA28942; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:19:49 +0100 (BST) Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18]) by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA08500; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:19:49 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200205090919.KAA08500@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> To: Michael Snyder cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, rearnsha@arm.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. X-Url: http://www.arm.com/ Subject: Re: [RFA] arm_scan_prologue: accept strh and strb as well as str In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 May 2002 15:28:38 PDT." <3CD9A696.CF676DB@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 02:20:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00266.txt.bz2 msnyder@redhat.com said: > Err, sorry, I should have mentioned that there are a few more trivial > white-space changes in here too. Sloppy of me. Forgot they were > there. Generally, its a good idea to keep unrelated white-space changes in a separate patch -- that way, should we need to back out the patch for technical reasons, we don't loose the independent white-space change. R.