From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-15216-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 18321 invoked by alias); 9 May 2002 09:14:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 18269 invoked from network); 9 May 2002 09:14:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 May 2002 09:14:21 -0000
Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id KAA00690; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:14:20 +0100 (BST)
Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xma029206; Thu, 9 May 02 10:13:30 +0100
Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.1.91])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA28260;
	Thu, 9 May 2002 10:13:29 +0100 (BST)
Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18])
	by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA07686;
	Thu, 9 May 2002 10:13:29 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200205090913.KAA07686@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>,
        gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, rearnsha@arm.com
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
X-Url: http://www.arm.com/
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Testing tweaks for xscale 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 May 2002 13:50:37 PDT."
             <3CD98F9D.A99D57EA@redhat.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 02:14:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00264.txt.bz2


> BTW, long_long.exp does not mention the strongarm.
> Should it?  Should strongarm go into the same clause as arm?

Yes, and yes -- as should the XScale test.

Hmm, I'm going to have to look at how to run this test quite carefully 
when I add VFP support...


R.