From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-15207-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 13730 invoked by alias); 9 May 2002 02:58:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 13723 invoked from network); 9 May 2002 02:58:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 May 2002 02:58:47 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g492wgF17617;
	Wed, 8 May 2002 21:58:42 -0500
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 19:58:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200205090258.g492wgF17617@duracef.shout.net>
To: ac131313@cygnus.com, msnyder@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] MI: accept (void) as well as ().
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, msnyder@cygnus.com
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2

Yes, all my dwarf-2 configurations show type="void (*)(void)", and all my
stabs+ configurations show type="void (*)()".  This is true for both
gcc v2 and gcc v3 compilers.

You can see the characteristic patterns in the attention table:

  http://www.shout.net/pub/mec/sunday/2002-05-05/Attention-gdb-HEAD.html

All five dwarf-2 configurations FAIL on these tests, and all five stabs+
configurations PASS.

Michael C