From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16913 invoked by alias); 7 May 2002 16:18:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16851 invoked from network); 7 May 2002 16:18:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 May 2002 16:18:42 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1757fk-0005IJ-00 for ; Tue, 07 May 2002 12:18:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 09:18:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com" Subject: Re: [RFA] Generalizing compiler invocation for FORTRAN95 testsuite Message-ID: <20020507161840.GA20239@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com" References: <3CD7EDA7.111E6F4B@caldera.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CD7EDA7.111E6F4B@caldera.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 11:07:19AM -0400, Petr Sorfa wrote: B> Hi, > > I'm going to be releasing the FORTRAN95 testsuite soon. Unfortunately > since there is currently no functional g95 the testsuite relies on > invoking Intel's FORTRAN95 compilers (efc (IA64) and ifc (IA32).) > > I'm just wondering how I should generalize this dependency and still > invoke the correct compilers? I recommend putting this logic directly into DejaGNU. You might want to ask on the DejaGNU list about how best to do it; Rob has a lot of experience with this sort of magic. > Would it also be a good idea to create a gdb.fortran95 directory under > gdb/testsuite/? Probably. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer