From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-15105-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 22153 invoked by alias); 7 May 2002 15:08:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 22134 invoked from network); 7 May 2002 15:08:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 May 2002 15:08:03 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g47F7xl13509;
	Tue, 7 May 2002 10:07:59 -0500
Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 08:08:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200205071507.g47F7xl13509@duracef.shout.net>
To: petrs@caldera.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]Use prev_lexptr in *-exp.y
Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, msnyder@redhat.com,
   muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00153.txt.bz2

Hmmm, if they are f90/f95 specific, and the existing tests are f77,
then I would prefer gdb.f90 or gdb.f95 to gdb.fortran (since they
are different languages).

Other opinions?

Michael C