From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14461 invoked by alias); 7 May 2002 14:54:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14423 invoked from network); 7 May 2002 14:53:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 May 2002 14:53:57 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1756Li-0004bV-00 for ; Tue, 07 May 2002 10:53:54 -0400 Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 07:54:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] fix ARI whinge about remote-rdi.c usage of true/false Message-ID: <20020507145354.GA17670@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200205071241.NAA18595@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200205071241.NAA18595@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:41:21PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > The ARI script is currently whingeing incorrectly that remote-rdi.c is > using 'true' and 'false', presumably because it cannot detect that the use > is inside a multi-line string. The following patch will clear this up, but > it relies on ANSI-style string concatenation. > > Are there any issues with doing it this way? In particular would this be > compatible with any future i18n work? > > R. > > * remote-rdi.c (_initialize_remote_rdi): Use ANSI-style string > concatenation for help messages. > > This should be fine; multiline strings are handled correctly by gettext, and GDB already contains string concatenation. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer