From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25188 invoked by alias); 4 May 2002 02:20:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25180 invoked from network); 4 May 2002 02:20:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 May 2002 02:20:47 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g442KjR00935; Fri, 3 May 2002 21:20:45 -0500 Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 19:20:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200205040220.g442KjR00935@duracef.shout.net> To: jimb@redhat.com, msnyder@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Check for corruption of cv_type chain Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 Michael Snyder writes: > We're supposed to be trying to _reduce_ the number of "ignore" failures. > Can't we xfail this on targets that don't support stabs or something? I think there's a misunderstanding here. As I've posted, all Jim's tests PASS on all my -gdwarf-2 configurations, except for gcc 3.0.4. And the gcc 3.0.4 -gdwarf-2 configuration is definitely not an "ignore" failure, it's gdb crashing. I'll put the files up for ftp so that Daniel J can have a look at it. Michael C