From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26257 invoked by alias); 3 May 2002 13:52:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26204 invoked from network); 3 May 2002 13:52:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 May 2002 13:52:22 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g43DqHB15897; Fri, 3 May 2002 08:52:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 06:52:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200205031352.g43DqHB15897@duracef.shout.net> To: msnyder@redhat.com, muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr Subject: Re: [RFA]Use prev_lexptr in *-exp.y Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00066.txt.bz2 Pierre Muller writes: > By the way, I don't have the necessary stuff to run the > testsuite... Thus I can not warranty that there are no > regressions. There mught be some wrong regressions, > if some testsuite do check the error output in case of > wrong expression entered. The error output should be more > logical now, but could get some tests to fail. Pierre, I have that covered. I run the test suite every 5-10 days on many configurations, and I have a good procedure for diff'ing the results and finding regressions. So if there are changes in the gdb output and they cause regressions in the test suite then I will catch them and post detailed bug reports. Michael C