Re: S390[x] configuration update

Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-29T19:06:48Z

On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 02:03:00PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> >>Yes, definitly closed.
> >>
> >>I also suspect there is no benefit in pulling it into the 5.2 branch
> >>once unfrozen. The existing stuff ``works'' - as they say, if it ain't
> >>broke don't fix it :-)
> >
> >
> >By ``works'' you mean doesn't build? :) See above; 5.2 won't build on
> >S/390.
>
> My understanding of Andreas's original post is that it updated things to
> current wisdom rather than fixed a pre-existing build problem.
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-04/msg01104.html

Different interpretation of his phrasing, perhaps. But no GNU/Linux
target that uses config/nm-linux.h can link without including
linux-proc.o; I assume it was missed because the .mh file is named
s390.mh instead of s390/linux.mh. S/390 doesn't build in 5.2 without
this patch.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer