From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26760 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2002 00:36:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26733 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2002 00:36:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Apr 2002 00:36:33 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 171cgK-0002UX-00 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 20:36:48 -0400 Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 17:36:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: S390[x] configuration update Message-ID: <20020427203648.A9559@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020427192408.A6259@nevyn.them.org> <20020427202525.A8877@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01109.txt.bz2 On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 02:31:33AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > |> The updated patch looks > |> good to me; you can probably just commit it, since it fixes a build > |> failure and is quite straightforward. > > Done. What about the 5.2 branch? Is it still possible to get this into > the release? Don't think so, since Andrew seems to have already rolled the release tarball. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer